Title
Neurobiological
Substrates of Depression and Treatment Response. From Brain Structure to Sex
Hormones.
Assessment Committee
- Prof. Jessica M.C. Lohmann, Competence Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry,
Mental Health Services CPH, Denmark
-
Prof. Philip Cowen, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, United
Kingdom
-
Ass. Prof. Daniel Lindqvist, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of
Medicine, Lund University, Sweden
Academic Advisors
- Prof. Martin Balslev Jørgensen, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Prof. Gitte M. Knudsen, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Dr. Vibeke H. Dam, Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Prof. Merete Osler, Frederiksberg Hospital Center for Clinical Research and
Prevention, Denmark
-
Ass. Prof. Anders Jørgensen, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Denmark
Thesis summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex and heterogeneous mental disorder
causing suffering worldwide. While effective treatments exist, including
pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, more than half of patients do not respond
adequately to their first medication. The search for reliable biomarkers to
guide treatment selection has largely focused on individual domains, e.g.
symptoms, social demographics, neuroimaging, genetics, or blood markers. Yet no
single marker has proven clinically useful. This reflects both the disorder's
heterogeneity and our limited understanding of the underlying biology.
This thesis investigates neurobiological mechanisms and markers of treatment
response in MDD through three studies using data from the NeuroPharm-1 study
and presents the ongoing BrainDrugs-Depression cohort study.
Study I challenges traditional views about antidepressant mechanisms by showing
that successful SSRI treatment was associated with decreased rather than
increased hippocampal volume. This suggests therapeutic effects may involve
circuit refinement rather than growth. We also found sex-specific relationships
between hippocampal volume and serotonin 4 receptor binding, with correlations
present only in women.
Study II failed to replicate previous findings that EEG abnormalities predict
poor response to escitalopram. However, patients with EEG abnormalities showed
greater emotional disturbance and poorer verbal memory, potentially marking a
distinct clinical phenotype rather than treatment resistance.
Study III revealed that in men, low pretreatment sex hormone levels predicted
sexual side effects from SSRIs but not treatment response. The finding that
higher testosterone levels were associated with vegetative symptoms like weight
loss likely reflects metabolic consequences of depression rather than
causation.
These studies highlight how depression and its treatment involve complex and
sex-specific mechanisms that cannot be reduced to simple biomarker-outcome
relations. The work provides a foundation for a more nuanced approach to
precision psychiatry that accounts for sex differences and multiple interacting
biological systems.
With this in mind, I present the BrainDrugs-Depression cohort study, which aims
to enable deep phenotyping of first-episode depression patients in a
naturalistic clinical setting in the Capital Region of Denmark. I showcase the
study's status and how it may enable studies of predictors and mechanisms of
treatment response to identify and understand who benefits from what.